|
|
Post by tcwolf on Jun 12, 2008 17:24:33 GMT -4
for the florida regionals. the agre groups are not merged right? or is 17s and 18s mixed and 15s and 16s mixed?
|
|
|
|
Post by gfhrgh on Jun 12, 2008 17:47:19 GMT -4
for the florida regionals. the agre groups are not merged right? or is 17s and 18s mixed and 15s and 16s mixed? i bet your worrying about the 17s beating u again haha |
|
|
|
Post by HMS on Jun 12, 2008 17:47:48 GMT -4
It is my understanding that the aged groups are not mixed. 15's and 16's do not play in same bracket.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2007poy on Jun 12, 2008 18:06:18 GMT -4
hey tcwolf, do you play club? what team are you on?
|
|
|
|
Post by guest011 on Jun 12, 2008 18:07:24 GMT -4
I have heard that the 1s are merged with the 17s. The 18s are in a seperate bracklet. As well as the 15s.
|
|
|
|
Post by tcwolf on Jun 12, 2008 18:28:03 GMT -4
wow ok u talk crap. its fine go ahead. but our 17s are great but we also beat them without sam walsh and gage. they had their way with us because of some problems with our team that day and they played amazing. so bad mix. and i am the libero for gold 18-1s. and for guest 011 did u mean to say 16s are merged with 17s?
|
|
|
|
Post by gfngfnfg on Jun 12, 2008 19:08:18 GMT -4
wow ok u talk crap. its fine go ahead. but our 17s are great but we also beat them without sam walsh and gage. they had their way with us because of some problems with our team that day and they played amazing. so bad mix. and i am the libero for gold 18-1s. and for guest 011 did u mean to say 16s are merged with 17s? so who would win if they played at florida regionals peter?? |
|
|
|
Post by tcwolf on Jun 12, 2008 23:04:01 GMT -4
who knows. its a sport. you dont kno who will win till the macth is over. thats why you play the game
|
|
|
|
Post by hmm on Jun 13, 2008 2:19:39 GMT -4
i heard sam was kind of "out of it" when the 17s and 18s played, but it seemed like other than that the rest of the team was there. no real excuses to be made.... that match could go either way no matter what players are capable of playing
|
|
|
|
Post by well on Jun 13, 2008 16:16:53 GMT -4
then what happened when golds 18's played sons 17's?
I think golds 17's and sons 17's this year will be as big as a rilvary as golds 18's and sons 18's last year. Everytime they played each other it was always a great match. both teams have the chance to play and do well in open next year if they stick together.
|
|
|
|
Post by whathappened on Jun 13, 2008 16:42:14 GMT -4
ya sam was. and the setter james was also late the match before and didnt set that match so everything was going wrong. killed the teams moral and if you were watching you can easily see none of them were in the mood to play. no emotion. and the game between sons 17s and sons 18s 18s shouldnt of lost. sons 17s are very strong nothing taken from them. but golds 18s were F'ing around before the game and you can see they kinda looked past the game and didnt come out ready to play and the sons 17s took advantage of it. also golds 18s missed over 14 serves in the match which hurts alot
|
|
|
|
Post by Sons on Jun 13, 2008 17:42:34 GMT -4
then what happened when golds 18's played sons 17's? I think golds 17's and sons 17's this year will be as big as a rilvary as golds 18's and sons 18's last year. Everytime they played each other it was always a great match. both teams have the chance to play and do well in open next year if they stick together. I think all the Sons and Gold teams are pretty good rivals. It will be great at Regional Sons15 vs Gold15 Sons 16 vs Gold 16 Sons 17 vs Gold 17 |
|
|
|
Post by tcwolf on Jun 13, 2008 18:18:07 GMT -4
wat about sons 18s and gold 18s?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sons on Jun 13, 2008 18:45:37 GMT -4
wat about sons 18s and gold 18s? Sorry- I forgot the 18's-- I hope this rivalry is still "friendly" |
|
|
|
Post by tcwolf on Jun 13, 2008 19:51:52 GMT -4
haha guess we will see
|
|
